Science Cultivation

Science Cultivation

The Biological Revolution with Cyborgs: The Integration of Artificial Intelligence and the Human Body

Document Type : Promotion Article

Authors
Department of Educational Management, To.C., Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
Abstract
Remarkable advancements in biotechnology, robotics, and artificial intelligence (AI) are gradually dissolving the traditional boundaries between humans and machines, placing concepts such as cyborgs and post-humanism at the heart of contemporary scientific and philosophical discourse. The notion of the cyborg, inspired by Donna Haraway’s Cyborg Theory and Lynn Margulis’ Endosymbiosis Theory, emerges as a symbol of humanity’s transition into a new era. These hybrid entities, born from the fusion of biological and artificial components, enable a profound integration of biology and engineering through technologies such as brain-computer interfaces, nanorobotics, and biofuel cells. However, significant challenges—including ambiguity in the legal personhood of cyborgs, a widening digital divide, and the escalating energy consumption of data centers—pose critical obstacles to the development of these technologies.
By outlining three plausible future scenarios—human optimization, transhumanism, and cyber-biological ecosystems—this article demonstrates that the path forward depends not only on technological progress but also on a radical rethinking of ethical and social paradigms. Ultimately, the paper emphasizes the necessity of moving beyond anthropocentrism toward ecological coexistence. This transition demands the creation of a cyborg philosophy and global frameworks such as cyber-bio governance, green design standards, and institutions like a Cybernetic United Nations to ensure technological justice. Embracing the fluidity of human identity and fostering interdisciplinary dialogue are key to transforming cyborgs from symbols of domination into catalysts for bio-democracy and ecological balance.
Keywords

[1]. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2016.
[2]. Feenberg, A. (2010). Ten paradoxes of technology. Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology, 14(1).
 [۳]. آراسته حمیدرضا, & خباره کبری. (2023). نقش هوش مصنوعی و تحول در آموزش عالی.14(1). 8-2.
 [4]. Haraway D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Simians, cyborgs and women. New York: Routledge; 1991.
 [5]. Margulis L. (1967).Origin of eukaryotic cells. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1967.
[۶]. مظفری, فاطمه, & عامری, فیروزه. (1403). درهم‌آمیختگی و توانمندسازی: واکاوی پیکربندی «خودِ پسامدرن» از منظر فمنیسم سایبورگ. مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
[۷]. مرادی برلیان, مهدی . (1402). سایبورگ و چالش های آن؛ درنگی از چشم انداز حقوق بشر. دوفصلنامۀ بین‌المللی حقوق‌بشر, 18(1), 241-262
 [8]. Grinin, L., & Grinin, A. (2020). The cybernetic revolution and the future of technologies. The 21st century singularity and global futures: a big history perspective, 377-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33730-8_17
 [9]. Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R., Henderson, J. M., & Shenoy, K. V. (2021). High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting. Nature, 593(7858), 249-254.
 [10]. Martel, S. (2015). Magnetic nanoparticles in medical nanorobotics. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17, 1-15.
 [11]. Shah, N. J., Hyder, M. N., Quadir, M. A., Dorval Courchesne, N. M., Seeherman, H. J., Nevins, M., & Hammond, P. T. (2014). Adaptive growth factor delivery from a polyelectrolyte coating promotes synergistic bone tissue repair and reconstruction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), 12847-12852.
 [12]. Svensson, P., Wijk, U., Björkman, A., & Antfolk, C. (2017). A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 14(6), 439-447.
 [13]. Bashor, C. J., & Collins, J. J. (2018). Understanding biological regulation through synthetic biology. Annual Review of Biophysics, 47(1), 399-423.
 [14]. Wang, Z. L. (2013). Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems and as active mechanical and chemical sensors. ACS Nano, 7(11), 9533-9557.
 [15]. Piech, D. K., Johnson, B. C., Shen, K., Ghanbari, M. M., Li, K. Y., Neely, R. M., & Muller, R. (2020). A wireless millimetre-scale implantable neural stimulator with ultrasonically powered bidirectional communication. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 4(2), 207-222.
 [16]. Moulin, T. C. (2020). Chronic optogenetic stimulation in freely  moving rodents. In Channelrhodopsin: Methods and protocols (pp. 391-401). New York, NY: Springer US.
 [17]. World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Global report on assistive technology. 2021. ISBN: 978-92-4-004945-1.
 [18]. Das, S., & Mao, E. (2020). The global energy footprint of information and communication technology electronics in connected Internet-of-things devices. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 24, 100408.
[19]. Barua, A., Al Alamin, M. A., Hossain, M. S., & Hossain, E. (2022). Security and privacy threats for bluetooth low energy in IOT and wearable devices: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 3, 251-281.
 [20]. Xu, C., Dai, Q., Gaines, L., Hu, M., Tukker, A., & Steubing, B. (2020). Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries. Communications Materials, 1(1), 99.
 [21]. Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984-986.
 [22]. da Cruz, L., Dorn, J. D., Humayun, M. S., Dagnelie, G., Handa, J., Barale, P. O., & Argus II Study Group. (2016). Five-year safety and performance results from the Argus II retinal prosthesis system clinical trial. Ophthalmology, 123(10), 2248-2254.
 [23]. Hofmann, B. (2017). Limits to human enhancement: nature, disease, therapy or betterment? BMC Medical Ethics, 18, 1-11.
 [24]. Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31-61.
 [25]. Ezeani, C. C., & Nweke, C. C. (2023). Transhumanism and limits of enhancement. CACH Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 4, 15-31.
[26]. Sagan, D. (2021). From empedocles to symbiogenetics: Lynn Margulis's revolutionary influence on evolutionary biology. BioSystems, 204, 104386.
 [27]. Gray, M. W. (2017). Lynn Margulis and the endosymbiont hypothesis: 50 years later. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 28(10), 1285-1287.

  • Receive Date 28 March 2025
  • Revise Date 07 April 2025
  • Accept Date 24 April 2025