Science Cultivation

Science Cultivation

Research Acceleration vs. Authenticity Concern: Two Sides of the AI Coin in Academic Writing

Document Type : Promotion Article

Author
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence, as the most powerful technological tool of the present century, has transcended the traditional boundaries of knowledge production and scientific research. This technology offers capabilities such as extraordinary data processing, automation of repetitive tasks, and assistance in complex analyses, providing an unprecedented opportunity to accelerate and deepen scientific discoveries. However, its application in writing scientific articles has brought significant achievements along with serious ethical, methodological, and legal challenges. Issues such as reduced transparency and research integrity, reinforcement of existing biases, violation of intellectual property rights, and reduction of researchers' analytical skills are examples of these difficulties. Faced with this complexity, the global community is striving to establish a balance between encouraging innovation and managing the risks associated with this technology by developing legal frameworks and regulations such as the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, the Bletchley Declaration, the Committee On Publication Ethics, and the recommendations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. This article examines the pros and cons of artificial intelligence in scientific writing and analyzes relevant international regulations to present a path for the responsible, transparent, and effective use of this tool in advancing science. Iran's national guidelines for AI use in research emphasize transparency and full disclosure of its application.
Keywords

[1]. European Parliament and Council (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689.
Retrieved from EUR-Lex website: (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng])
[2]. Executive Order 14110 of October 30, 2023. Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Federal Register: The Daily Journal of the United States Government, Vol. 88, No. 211. (November 1, 2023).
(Retrieved from: (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-11-01/pdf/2023-24283.pdf)
[3]. UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT). (2023, November 1). The Bletchley Declaration by Countries Attending the AI Safety Summit, 1-2 November 2023.
Retrieved from: (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-summit-2023-the-bletchley-declaration)
]4[. منتظری، حسام، غفاری، احمدرضا؛ موسوی موحدی، علی اکبر (1402). کاربردهای چت جی پی تی در تحقیقات علمی و ملاحظات اخلاقی استفاده از آن، نشریه نشا علم، 13، 1، 148-156. 
[5]. OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD Legal Instruments). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Retrieved from: (https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449)
OR:
OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Retrieved from: (https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles)
[6]. European Parliament and Council. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 04/05/2016, P. 1–88. Retrieved from: (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679)
[7]. Smolčić, V. S. (2013). Salami publication: definitions and examples. Biochemia Medica, 23(3), 237–241. (doi:10.11613/BM.2013.030 )
[8]. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2025). Retrieved from (https://publicationethics.org)
 [۹]. وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری جمهوری اسلامی ایران ( 25 آبان ماه 1404). راهنمای استفاده از ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی در پژوهش، تهیه شده توسط مؤسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور
[۱۰]. بنیاد علم ایران (1404). دستورالعمل استفاده از ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی در پژوهش  (www.insf.org)

  • Receive Date 01 February 2026
  • Revise Date 09 February 2026
  • Accept Date 11 February 2026