Avoid from Research Misconduct and its Inhibition Mechanism

Taghavi, Fereshteh; Saboury, Ali Akbar

Avoid from Research Misconduct and its Inhibition Mechanism

Document Type : Promotion Article

Authors

¹ Faculty of Biological Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

² Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran,Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Research misconduct, as an unrecognizable contravention of scientific revelation, is a developing phenomenon in the present years. Its destructive effect on the body, integrity and reliability of knowl-edge has made it very important. The recognition and tracking of obvious and ambiguous new forms of research misconducts and invitation of the scientific communities to committed encountering with them are the main concern of global organizations. This study presents a brief overview of new au-thors’ research misconducts as salami publishing and editors’ more acute research misconducts as coercive citation, pseudo- engineering of impact factors and citation cartel. Also, the effective factors in the loss of research ethics, scientific integrity, researchers’ commitment, social control mechanism of research misconduct and its treatment were studied in details.

Keywords

20.1001.1.2008935.1392.04.1.6.6

References

[۱]. موسوی دوست، س.، فنودی، ح. (۱۳۸۹) "تخلفات و دستبردهای علمی و ادبی". نشریه نشاء علم، سال اول، شماره اول، صفحات ۲۹-21.
[2]. Editorial. (2013). "Whither Research Integrity? Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism and Coercive Citation in an Aage of Research Aassessment" , Research Policy, Vol. 42,PP. 1005– 1014.
[3]. Lee, J. (2011)."The Past, Present, and Future of Scientific Misconduct Research: What Has Been Done? What Needs to be Done?". Journal of the Professoriate, Vol. 6, PP. 67-83.
[4]. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (1995). "On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research", 2nd ed., National Academies Press, Washington DC, 39p.
[5]. نادری، م.، رحیمی وقار، ر.، ، موسوی موحدی، ع. ..(۱۳۹۰). "رهنمودهای اخلاقی برای نویسندگان نوشتارهای پژوهشی"، نشریه نشاء علم، سال دوم، شماره اول، صفحات ۵۷-۵۳.
[6]. Wells, S. Farthing, F., M. (2001). "Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research Lock", Edited by, BMJ Books, London, 264p.
[7]. Michael C. Loui. (2002)."Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct", Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 8, PP. 529-539.
[8]. Dooley, J. J., Kerch, H. M. (2000). "Evolving Research Misconduct Policies and Their Significance for Physical scientists", Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol.6, PP.109–121.
[9]. Proceedings of the Retreat on: "The Journal’s Role in Scientific Misconduct "(2003). Resort and Conference Center Lansdowne, Lansdowne, Virginia.
[۱۰]. موسوی موحدی، ع. 1.(1376). "شیوه های نشر و اشاعه یافته های علمی، مجموعه مقالات همایش روش شناسی و فنون تحقیق "، دانشگاه، تهران، صفحات ۲۳۸ - 204.
[۱۱]. موسوی موحدی، ع. ا.، کیانی بختیاری، ا.، چمنی، ج. خ. (۱۳۸۲). "روش های تولید و اشاعه یافته های علمی"، مجله رهیافت، فصلنامه سیاست علمی و پژوهشی ، شماره ۳۱، صفحات ۱۹-5.
[12]. Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E. (2013). "Case Studies for Ethics in Academic Research in the Social Sciences", SAGE Publications Inc., Washington DC, 104p.