نشاء علم

نشاء علم

خودشبکه نگاری در مطالعات گردشگری

نوع مقاله : مقاله ترویجی

نویسنده
استادیار گروه مدیریت و اقتصاد گردشگری، دانشکده گردشگری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
علوم مختلف، به­ویژه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی از دهه‌های اخیر تاکنون، همواره با چرخش‌های روش‌شناسی مواجه بوده است. هر چند­وقت­یکبار باید منتظر روش‌شناسی­های جدیدی در پژوهش‌های مختلف بود. در این راستا، هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، معرفی شیوه پژوهش و نگارش خودشبکه­نگاری و کاربرد آن می­باشد. با توجه به این­که روش تحقیق خودشبکه­نگاری در ایران بسیار نوپا می­باشد و در حیطه مطالعات گردشگری به آن توجهی نشده است، به­نظر می­رسد حیطه پژوهشی ارزشمند و جذابی برای محققان در آینده باشد. خودشبکه­نگاری، رویکردی از شبکه­نگاری است که نقش تجربه‌های آنلاین ِخودِ شبکه­نگار را در تحقیق برجسته می‌سازد. خودشبکه­نگاری به محققان اجازه می‌دهد تجارب آنلاین خود را انعکاس دهند تا به بینش‌های درون تجارب، فرهنگ‌ها، و مقصودهای کاربران آنلاین دست یابند. هرچند از دیدگاه برخی پژوهشگران، استفاده مستقل از روش خودشبکه­نگاری در تحقیق­ها مورد انتقاد است، اما بااین‌حال، حامیان این روش معتقدند که اگر خودشبکه­نگاری به‌عنوان بخشی از طرح‌های تحقیقی دیگر، همچون مردم­نگاری یا شبکه­نگاری، به‌کار گرفته شود، می‌تواند تعادل بهتری را به‌همراه داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Autonetnography in Tourism Studies

نویسنده English

sajad Ferdowsi
Assistant Professor, Department of Tourism Management and Economics, Faculty of Tourism, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Various sciences, especially humanities and social sciences, have continually encountered methodological shifts in recent decades. Periodically, we await new methodologies in various research endeavors. In this regard, the current research aims to introduce the method of conducting and writing autonetnography and its applications. Given that the autonetnography research method is relatively novel in Iran and has not received attention in the field of tourism studies, it appears to be a valuable and enticing research area for future researchers. Autonetnography is an approach within netnography that emphasizes the role of the netnographer's own online experiences in research. It enables researchers to reflect on their online experiences to obtain insights into the experiences, cultures, and intentions of online users. Although some researchers criticize the independent use of the autonetnography method in research, supporters of this method believe that if autonetnography is incorporated into other research projects, such as ethnography or netnography, it can achieve a better balance and be more effective.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Autonetnography
Netnography
Ethnography
Autoethnography
Tourism
  • Xun, J. & Reynolds, J. (2010). Applying netnography to market research: The case of the online forum. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 18(1), 17-31.
  • Riemer, Frances J. (2008). Ethnography Research (Chapter 11). Lapan.
  • Briggs, Daniel (2011). Emotions, ethnography and crack cocaine users. Emotion, Space and Society, 5(1), 1-12.
  • Myers, Michael D. (1999). Investigating Information System with Etunographic Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(23).
  • Creswell, J. W., (2011). Educational Research- Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, pearson: Addison Wesley.
  • Goulding, Christina (2005). Grornded Theory, Ethnography and Comparative Analysis of three Qualitative Strategies for Marketing Research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4), 294-308.
  • Sommerville, Ian, Rodden, Tom, Sawyer, Pete, Bently, Richard, & Twidal, Michael (1992). Integrating Ethnography into the Requirements Engineering Process, IEEE.
  • Hisyam Selamat, M., & Azizi, H. H., (2008). A Qualitative Decision Trail in the Hermeneutic Analysis Evidence from the Case Study, International Journal of Business and Management, 3(3), pp 41-55.
  • Kozinets, R. V., (2002). The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities, Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), pp 61-72.
  • Kozinets, R. V., (2010). Netnography: doing ethnographic research online, Los Angeles, Calif.; London: SAGE.
  • Langer, R., & Beckman, S. C., (2005). Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), pp189-203.
  • De Lassus, C., & Anido Freire, N., (2014). Access to the luxury brand myth in pop-up stores: A netnographic and semiotic analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(1), pp 61-68.
  • Rollins, M., Nickell, D. & Wei, J. (2014). Understanding salespeople's learning experiences through blogging: A social learning approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), pp 1063-1069.
  • Seraj, M., (2012), We Create, We Connect, We Respect, Therefore We Are: Intellectual, Social, and Cultural Value in Online Communities, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), pp 209-222.
  • Rageh, A., Melewar, T. C., & Woodside, A., (2010). A netnography study to uncover the underlying dimensions of customer experience with resort brands. Retrieved from v-scheiner. brunel.ac.uk website.
  • Andersen, P. H. (2005). Relationship marketing and brand involvement of professionals through web-enhanced brand communities: The case of Coloplast. Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (1), 39–51.
  • Gaitán A. (2000), Exploring Alternative Forms of Writing Ethnography. Qualitative Social Research; 1(3): 31-40.
  • Atkinson P. Rescuing Autoethnography. JCE 2006; 35(4): 400-4.
  • Hunt SA, Junco NR. Introduction to Two Thematic Issues. JCE 2006; 35(4): 371-2.
  • Vryan KD. (2006), Expanding Analytic Autoethnography and Enhancing Its Potential. JCE; 35(4): 405-9.
  • Denzin NK, Lincoln Y, Rolling JR JH. (2006), Special Issue on Autoethnography, Critical Race Theory, and Performance Studies. Qualitative Inquiry; 12(2): 427-9.
  • Foster K, McAllister M, O'Brien L. (2005), Coming to Autoethnography: A Mental Health Nurse's Experience. IJQM; 4(4): 2-13.
  • Sparkes AC. (2012), Autoethnography and Narratives of Self: Reflections on Criteria in Action. SSJ; 17(1): 21-43.
  • Leavy, P., (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Adams, T. E. & Holman Jones, S. & Ellis, C. (2015), Autoethnography, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Doloriert, Clair; Sambrook, Sally (2012) "Organisational autoethnography", Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 1, Issue: 1, pp.83-95.
  • Kozinets, R. V. (2006). Netnography 2.0. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 129–142). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Kozinets, R. V., & Kedzior, R. (2009). I, Avatar: Auto-netnographic research in virtual worlds. In N. T. Wood & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Virtual social identity and consumer behavior (pp. 3–19). M. E. Sharpe.
  • Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4 (138)), 273–290.
  • Anderson L. (2006), Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography; 35(4): 373-95.
  • Brogi, S. (2014). Online brand communities: A literature review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 385–389.
  • Mkono, M. (2013). African and Western tourists: object authenticity quest? Annals of Tourism Research, 41, 195–214.
  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, D. J. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). CA: Sage.
  • Barbieri, C., Santos, C. A., & Katsube, Y. (2012). Volunteer tourism: On the ground observations from Rwanda. Tourism Management, 33, 509–516.
  • Buckley, R. (2012). Rush as a key motivation in skilled adventure tourism: Resolving the risk recreation paradox. Tourism Management, 33, 961–970.
  • Noy, C. (2008). The poetics of tourist experience: An autoethnography of a family trip to Eilat. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 5, 141–157.
  • Scarles, C. (2010). Where words fail, visuals ignite: Opportunities for visual autoethnography in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 37, 905–926.
  • Ateljevic, I., Harris, C., Wilson, E., & Collins, F. L. (2005). Getting ‘Entangled’: Reflexivity and the ‘Critical Turn’ in tourism studies.Tourism Recreation Research, 30(2), 9–21.
  • Mkono, M., Ruhanen, L., & Markwell, K. (2015). From netnography to autonetnography in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 52, 167-169.

Allen-Collinson, J. (2012). Autoethnography: Situating personal sporting narratives in socio-cultural contexts. Research in the Sociology of Sport, 6, 191–212.

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 فروردین 1403