[1]. H.-W. Cheng, “Challenges and Limitations of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research: A Perspective from Organic Materials,” AI, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 401–405, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/ai4020021.
[2]. A. Tlili et al., “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/S40561-023-00237-X/FIGURES/13.
[3]. R. D. Taylor, “Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A ‘precautionary’ U.S. approach?,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 44, no. 6, p. 101909, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.TELPOL.2020.101909.
[4]. “What is ChatGPT? | OpenAI Help Center.” https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6783457-what-is-chatgpt (accessed Jun. 24, 2023).
[5]. M. Wölfel and V. Taecharungroj, “‘What Can ChatGPT Do?’ Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter,” Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2023, Vol. 7, Page 35, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 35, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/BDCC7010035.
[6]. E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 103, no. March, p. 102274, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
[7]. Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 71, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
[8]. R. Vaishya, A. Misra, and A. Vaish, “ChatGPT: Is this version good for healthcare and research?,” Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 102744, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.DSX.2023.102744.
[9]. R. A. Khan, M. Jawaid, A. R. Khan, and M. Sajjad, “ChatGPT - Reshaping medical education and clinical management,” Pakistan J. Med. Sci., vol. 39, no. 2, p. 605, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.12669/PJMS.39.2.7653.
[10]. P. Gandhi, V. T.-I. J. M. Sci, and undefined 2023, “Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in the legal context,” ijmsweb.com, vol. 75, doi: 10.25259/IJMS_34_2023.
[11]. N. Surameery, M. S.-I. J. of, and undefined 2023, “Use chat gpt to solve programming bugs,” journal.hmjournals.com, vol. 03, no. 01, pp. 2455–5290, 2022, doi: 10.55529/ijitc.31.17.22.
[12]. S. S. Biswas, “Potential Use of Chat GPT in Global Warming,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 6, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/S10439-023-03171-8.
[13]. M.-A. Sicilia, N. Bessis, M. Trovati, H. Hassani, and E. S. Silva, “The Role of ChatGPT in Data Science: How AI-Assisted Conversational Interfaces Are Revolutionizing the Field,” Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2023, Vol. 7, Page 62, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 62, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/BDCC7020062.
[14]. Y. J. Park et al., “Can ChatGPT be used to generate scientific hypotheses?,” Mar. 2023, Accessed: Jun. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.12208v1
[15]. J. Huang and M. Tan, “The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles,” Am. J. Cancer Res., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1148, 2023, Accessed: Jun. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: /pmc/articles/PMC10164801/
[16]. M. Liebrenz, R. Schleifer, A. Buadze, D. Bhugra, and A. Smith, “Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing,” Lancet Digit. Heal., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. e105–e106, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5.
[17]. C. Stokel-Walker and R. Van Noorden, “What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science,” Nature, vol. 614, no. 7947, pp. 214–216, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1038/D41586-023-00340-6.
[18]. E. A. M. van Dis, J. Bollen, W. Zuidema, R. van Rooij, and C. L. Bockting, “ChatGPT: five priorities for research,” Nat. 2023 6147947, vol. 614, no. 7947, pp. 224–226, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7.
[19]. C. Stokel-Walker, “ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove,” Nature, vol. 613, no. 7945, pp. 620–621, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1038/D41586-023-00107-Z.
[20]. “Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use,” Nature, vol. 613, no. 7945, p. 612, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1038/D41586-023-00191-1.
[21]. “Taylor & Francis Clarifies the Responsible use of AI Tools in Academic Content Creation - Taylor & Francis Newsroom.” https://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/taylor-francis-clarifies-the-responsible-use-of-ai-tools-in-academic-content-creation/# (accessed Jun. 24, 2023).
[22]. “The use of AI and AI-assisted writing technologies in scientific writing.” https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/publishing-ethics/the-use-of-ai-and-ai-assisted-writing-technologies-in-scientific-writing (accessed Jun. 24, 2023).
[23]. H. H. Thorp, “ChatGPT is fun, but not an author,” Science (80-. )., vol. 379, no. 6630, p. 313, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.ADG7879.